Fundraising for Public Education

I made my contribution, finished up my research (loved the site by the way), and moved on with life and work.

Envelope: Courtesy of the USPS, DonorsChoose.org, Mr. Tourzan, and his Students
This week, I received a 9 X 12 envelope from DonorsChoose.org. I opened it half cringing, expecting a plea for another donation. Instead, I found hand-written, illustrated, and teacher-edited thank you notes from Chris, Vivian, Bryce, Cora, Cassia, Kazes, Julianne, Thomas, one that was unsigned, and one from Zach Walker at DonorsChoose. I read them all outloud half-laughing and half-crying. They were hilarious: heartfelt and specific about what each students liked best (e.g. going to the stream “6 times!”, talking at the symposium, adding in the poisonous chemicals, watching the “0xygen go down”, etc.).

Here are the photos and thank-yous if you’d like to take a peek. My favorite illustration is posted below.

The whole exchange was a great experience.

What’s Going on Here?

Hmmm…..Feeling a twinge of guilt. Why did I respond so positively to this experience (which benefited kids I do not know personally), compared to other recent experiences at the schools of my nieces, nephews and godsons?

Here’s what I came up with:

1. The ask was simple. I knew exactly what was needed and why, how much it cost ($490), and who would benefit. (Assuming one more of those kids adopts environmental stewardship as a lifelong practice, we may all be saved. You’re welcome. Please pay it forward).
2. The donation supported applied, interdisciplinary learning, not pencils, textbooks, or teachers. Personal preference maybe, but I am squeamish about fundraisers that aim to pay for basic classroom supplies, capital expenses, or program fundamentals (of which art, music, and physical education are a part). I want my donations to support programs that address unmet need, explore new ways to offer learning opportunities, or connect subject-matter to civic engagement. Mr. Tourzan’s program meets these criteria (heck, I would like to enroll in his program).
3. The transaction was mission-related. I can’t stand bidding on wine at a silent auction so that kids can have computers in school. There I said it. Again, I understand how we’ve come to this situation, but that does not make it right. It takes a lot of effort to organize auctions and events, and most leave me wondering how we might have invested that time differently for greater gain. Not to mention, I’m not sure what we’re teaching kids when we suggest that their ability to have a decent education depends upon the decision of a private citizen to buy a vacation weekend, massage, or fine-dining experience at an auction.
4. The scale of the request was manageable (for my budget anyway) and I really liked the crowd-sourcing aspect of contributing on DonorsChoose (I like this about Kiva.org, too):  I couldn’t shoulder the whole $490, but together, five of us could. And we could even connect with one another and Mr. Tourzan, here.
5. The approach is entrepreneurial but does not engage kids it direct selling, nor place undue burdens on teachers. It wasn’t that long ago that I sold everything from garbage bins to honey to people who did not need these things so that we could maintain a music class. Enough said.
6. The site makes visible what’s going on in classrooms that participate. This is certainly a higher level of transparency than most schools and districts offer about their special projects.
7. The thank-you notes were an unexpected, personal, and delightful surprise. They engage kids in the effort (and cultivate good writing habits). And the difference between my reaction to those letters, compared to the average polished, corporate-style appeal that arrives at my doorstep…let’s just say I’ll be giving to DonorsChoose again.

And I have not put the letters in the recycling bin.

Share/Save

Thanks to NJ.. on Flickr

Last week we were drafting a set of policy recommendations for a project. We’d drafted an introduction that named demographics, technology, and the competitive landscape as among the most significant domains of change in the workplace during the past decade. At that point I realized how many times I’d seen this collection of words and phrases in a bulleted powerpoint list, or similarly glibly treated as if the meaning (and implications) of these change were self-evident.

We decided to say what we meant. Here’s the list we came up with in answer to the question “How is the workforce landscape different today than ten years ago?” We know it’s not complete, but it’s a start. We’d love to know your thoughts.

Key Workforce Trends

“Growth minus Jobs.” While economists debate the causes and implications of the trend, job growth following the last two recessions has been far lower than what was expected. In our current “job-less recovery,” the seven million private sector jobs lost in the 20 months between December 2007 and August 2009 are returning an anemic pace (and many of them do not pay family-sustaining wages), while labor force continues to grow by 1.3 million people per year.

“Millennials and Boomers Sandwich Gen-X.” For the first time in our history, it is commonplace for four or even five generations to occupy the workplace at the same time – challenging tradition hierarchies, management practices, and raising serious equity issues as “baby boomers” delay retirement and firms resist taking on new (younger) full-time employees who are far more racially, ethnically, and linguistically diverse than their more senior colleagues (and peers).

“Wanted: Life-long Learners.” The demands on all workers to develop new and more diverse skills throughout their working lives – as the baseline required for good jobs increases – raises complex challenges for employers and government (who pays?), difficult decisions for workers (“Do I train for two years in hopes I get a job at the new Google facility?”), and disrupts assumptions about what it means to be a student (non-traditionals are the new traditionals).

“Anywhere, anytime, any device connectivity.” We’re only at the beginning of understanding how connecting people to data, information, and each other will change the way we live work and learn, but the implications for workers – who’s talents can be tapped globally, firms – who’s value chains now include customers and competitors, and communities – which will thrive based their uniqueness and desirability, are significant (and mindbending).

“Show me the three Rs (Reduce, Re-Use, Recycle).” Questions about the sustainability of our consumption-based economy and its role in climate change are causing a massive rethink of public policy around energy, water, food systems, and how these and other natural resources are used in industry and commerce. This is already changing what it means for workers, firms, industries, communities, and nations to be competitive in the new new economy.

These shifts show no evidence of slowing. Public policy must also change with the times.

And today, there are few areas of public policy more important to the nation’s economic competitiveness than the skills, ingenuity, and health of its 139-million person workforce.

Share/Save

Thanks to deanmeyersnet on Flickr.

Really high unemployment among youth.

One of the most alarming bits of bad news in a sea of unwelcome statistics about unemployment, is just how bad it is for the young American worker these days. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) finds that the proportion of young people employed in July was 51.4 percent, “the lowest July rate on record for the series, which began in 1948.”

Where is this headed?

This is the future of our country being handed a raw deal. It is the responsibility of workforce professionals to think outside the box and create new methods of mentoring, offering career ladders that make sense, and nurturing an entrepreneurial culture to foster innovation.

“When I was coming up…”

When thinking back to my own career and its challenges, I realized that I know something about looking for work during a recession. In fact I was born during the recession of 1958.

Overqualified and underemployed.

I graduated from college in the recession of 1981. I turned to the government agency to help me and my employment counselor told me my BA was worth “bugger all”, and it wouldn’t help me contend with the dearth of good jobs. I waited tables until American Motors was hiring, found work there, and got laid off three months later. Entering the workforce during a recession ensured I would remain underemployed until I decided to go to graduate school.

“Hey, does anybody give a rip?”

The unemployed person is in a vexing solitary cycle of rejection. This recession amplifies the alienation the unemployed experience, possibly more so for young people who are used to the support and camaraderie of a social group. When you look for work, you’re on your own. Some blame a higher minimum wage for higher youth unemployment rates, and make comments like “Most of these teens and twenty-somethings aren’t worth a damn even when they are “employed”

Bootstraps and all that…

When you are young, you are often undervalued by your elders. You’re told to work hard to get ahead but no one tells you how, and you have to find your own way. We love people who succeeded through adversity with hard work.

Can we have some collaboration please?

But if we are to successfully transform this great challenge into opportunity, we all need to counter the pessimism and negativity floating around America right now by offering help, wisdom and compassion. Here in Southern Arizona we are at work on a community collaboration platform called (AZ)WeToo.^TM Initially created as a platform for supporting entrepreneurs in Michigan, we are finding new applications for WeToo^TM in other communities.  It could be used to help aggregate job-finding (or job-making) resources and connect these young people to each other. Whether through this tool or others, we need to connect young people around work in the same way we connect them socially or around other common interests.

WorkBook

I propose is that Workforce Boards, One Stops, all levels of government create a FaceBook for workers, a WorkBook if you will, where young workers can find information, mentors, networks, and each other. While web tools alone are not the solution, they do address many of the vexing problems of alienation and isolation that create a sense of hopelessness in the face of so much adversity. Online profiles lead to visibility, visibility leads to connection and a sense of community. Job opportunities can come as a tweet, and mentors can offer advice and wisdom from their BlackBerries.

It’s time to act.

We should all pay attention to this serious problem of youth unemployment. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to help them help us create the eventual recovery and a sustainable economy.

Share/Save